M1Pilon made a motion to adjourn the Special Meeting at 10:20 PM; Reighard seconded. All in favor; motion carried.
moved by Pilon, seconded by Reighard
All in favor
Loading records…
Thursday, July 27, 2017
Agenda
Not posted
What was on the agenda.
Packet
Not posted
The supporting materials council reviewed.
One-line summary
Council held a special meeting to discuss road-improvement feasibility studies, special assessments (MN Statutes Chapter 429), and financing options; the meeting adjourned at 10:20 PM.
2 items as recorded in the packet and minutes.
AFeasibility Studies for Road Improvements and Assessment Guidelines and Procedures
Discussion with the city engineer, attorney, and financial advisor about road improvement projects, special assessments, and financing options.
The minutes describe discussion and next steps but do not record a formal approval action for a project at this meeting.
ZAdjournment
Motion carried to adjourn at 10:20 PM.
What this meeting did about specific topics, organized by issue rather than by document.
Road improvements feasibility studies, special assessments, and financing approach
Council held a special meeting with the city engineer (Shane Nelson), attorney (Bob Ruppe), and financial advisor (Bruce Kimmel) to talk through how road projects could be planned and paid for, including the Chapter 429 special assessment process, benefit concepts (direct and indirect), and typical timelines like feasibility and hearings. The engineer described the city’s road system and rough cost ranges for overlays and reconstruction, and discussed updating priorities via a five-year plan. Staff were directed informally toward next steps: the engineer will bring a proposal in August, and the attorney will provide a written summary and point the council to League of Minnesota Cities resources.
Agenda: A. Speakers: Jeff Pilon, Dan Breyen, Mary Rainville, Paul Reighard, Randy Bettinger, Shane Nelson, Bob Ruppe, Bruce Kimmel.
1 motion on the record. Split votes are highlighted.
M1Pilon made a motion to adjourn the Special Meeting at 10:20 PM; Reighard seconded. All in favor; motion carried.
moved by Pilon, seconded by Reighard
All in favor
Each figure links back to the document it came from. When the council voted on the amount, the motion is shown.
F1
Engineer noted that in 2012 there was an estimate of road-improvement/repair backlog for bituminous paved roads.
estimate · Road improvement backlog estimate (2012)
$3,300,000
unknown
Council approval status: not yet on record.
F2
Estimated cost per mile to build a paved road (low end).
estimate · Paved road construction cost per mile (today's dollars)
$350,000
unknown
Council approval status: not yet on record.
F3
Estimated cost per mile to build a paved road (high end).
estimate · Paved road construction cost per mile (today's dollars)
$450,000
unknown
Council approval status: not yet on record.
F4
Estimated investment/asset value in the city’s paved roads (low end).
asset_value · Estimated paved-road asset value
$15,000,000
unknown
Council approval status: not yet on record.
F5
Estimated investment/asset value in the city’s paved roads (high end).
asset_value · Estimated paved-road asset value
$19,000,000
unknown
Council approval status: not yet on record.
F6
Estimated cost per mile to construct gravel roads (low end).
estimate · Gravel road construction cost per mile
$100,000
unknown
Council approval status: not yet on record.
F7
Estimated cost per mile to construct gravel roads (high end).
estimate · Gravel road construction cost per mile
$150,000
unknown
Council approval status: not yet on record.
F8
Estimated investment/asset value in gravel roads (low end).
asset_value · Estimated gravel-road asset value
$3,000,000
unknown
Council approval status: not yet on record.
F9
Estimated investment/asset value in gravel roads (high end).
asset_value · Estimated gravel-road asset value
$4,000,000
unknown
Council approval status: not yet on record.
F10
Engineer’s combined estimate of investment/assets in roads.
asset_value · Estimated total road asset value (combined)
$20,000,000
unknown
Council approval status: not yet on record.
F11
Estimated overlay cost per mile (low end).
estimate · Overlay cost per mile
$130,000
unknown
Council approval status: not yet on record.
F12
Estimated overlay cost per mile (high end).
estimate · Overlay cost per mile
$180,000
unknown
Council approval status: not yet on record.
F13
Estimated total reconstruction cost per mile (low end).
estimate · Total reconstruction cost per mile
$500,000
unknown
Council approval status: not yet on record.
F14
Estimated total reconstruction cost per mile (high end).
estimate · Total reconstruction cost per mile
$700,000
unknown
Council approval status: not yet on record.
F15
Total for selected claims listed in the included claims history.
invoice · Claims History total (claims #309-#350 date range 7/12/2017 to 8/7/2017)
$220,850.84
outflow
Council approval status: not yet on record.
When someone tried to remember earlier business, we cross-reference the corpus and write a short related-history note.
Engineer Shane Nelson said the City has not done a road project since 2008. In 2012 he prepared a Street Study and rated all the roads in Nowthen.
— Shane Nelson
What this is about
References prior road work (2008) and a 2012 street study as background for current road planning.
The resolver has not run for this cue, or the search did not find a strong match in the corpus.
Every document and recording archived for this meeting.
The structured brief on this page is auto-generated and may need correction. The PDFs and the meeting recording remain the official record.